Connect with us


$80 cheaper than the iPhone SE 3, is the Samsung Galaxy A53 the best budget smartphone of 2022?



iphone se 3 or samsung a53 smartphone

We compare the Samsung Galaxy A53 $349 / £399 and iPhone SE 3 $429 / £419 High End Best Budget Smartphones

To some smartphone users the high end smartphone is complete overkill, but most people still desire a phone with long battery life, a fast processor, high-quality camera setup, exceptional design, large storage capacity, and other features even if it is classed as a “budget smartphone”. The competition here stands for the latest Apple’s A15 powered iPhone SE3 and Samsung’s Galaxy A53 5G.

Samsung claims their Galaxy A53 to be the finest budget phone of 2022, but is it enough to give challenge to Apple’s iPhone SE 3?

These smartphone companies are always attempting to deliver the best screens, CPUs, batteries, and other components in their phones while keeping pricing as low as possible.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is coming in at $449 / £399 , with a large display, multiple cameras, and a large battery. The other option is the iPhone SE3 with its less so appealing similar design of the iPhone 8, however, the chip powering iPhone SE 3 is the same one used in the iPhone 13 Pro. With the cost of the handset at $429, this price tag becomes a lot more appealing especially with the processors spec. If by any chance both the Samsung A53 5G and iPhone SE3 have piqued your interest, here is a deeper look at both the devices to help you determine which the is better option.


The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s design immediately puts it leagues ahead of the competition. It has a 6.5-inch screen, a camera cutout with a hole punch, and very tiny bezels. With a Super AMOLED screen, a resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels and a refresh rate of 120Hz, the display meets all of the requirements of a high end budget smartphone.

In comparison, the iPhone SE 3 still has the same design from 2017. That’s because it is, in a way. The iPhone SE 3’s design is nearly comparable to that of the iPhone 8. It sports a 4.7-inch screen, a physical home button, and massive bezels on the top and bottom. The screen is likewise unimpressive. It’s an LCD with a 1334 x 750 resolution and a refresh rate of 60Hz.

If you want one of the smallest smartphones available today, the iPhone SE 3 is ideal. However, if you want a large and colourful screen for watching movies, playing games, reading the web, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the way to go.

iPhone SE 3 vs Samsung A53 chart


What the iPhone SE 3 lacks in the current design, it soon makes up for in processing power. The iPhone SE 3 is powered by Apple’s A15 Bionic processor. This is the same processor that is utilised in the iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro. In other words, the iPhone SE 3 is a powerhouse. It can handle any software or mobile game you throw at it. With its octa-core Exynos 1280 CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is no slouch, but the A15 Bionic is the smartphone chip to beat.


However, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G compensates for this in the storage sector. Samsung has storage options of 128GB or 256GB, as well as microSD compatibility for extra storage. The iPhone SE 3 features half the beginning storage capacity at 64GB and no expanded storage choices. If you need extra storage space, you’ll have to spend more for the 128 or 256GB variants.


Then there are the cameras. Once again, the Galaxy A53 5G provides the kind of performance you’d expect from a much more costly flagship. A 64MP primary camera, a 12MP ultra-wide camera, a 5MP macro camera, and a 5MP depth camera are included. What about the iPhone SE 3? On the rear, there is only a single 12MP camera. The iPhone SE 3 produces nice shots for the budget, but the A53 5G’s quad-camera configuration is superior in every way.

Samsung also included a better selfie camera. The front-facing camera of the A53 5G is 32MP and supports 4K video recording. The iPhone SE 3 sports a 7MP selfie camera that can record in 1080 Full HD and the rear camera is very good as usual in what we expect from all iPhones now days (of course not to the same quality of the higher end Apple iPhones).


Another significant advantage for the A53 5G is its battery life. The phone has a 5000 mAh battery and has “up to two-day battery life,” according to Samsung. Apple did not specifically indicate the battery capacity of the SE 3, however, it is expected to be the same 1821 mAh capacity as the SE 2. But rumours in the air as well about the SE3 is having a 2821mAH battery capacity. (None is confirmed yet)

The SE 3 is a phone you’ll need to charge at the end of the day, despite Apple’s claim of up to 15 hours of video playback. When it comes to charging, the Galaxy A53 5G offers up to 25W wired charging rates, compared to the iPhone SE 3’s 18W. However, only the iPhone SE 3 supports wireless charging.


Another significant distinction between the phones is their software. The Galaxy A53 5G is powered by Android 12, whereas the iPhone SE 3 is powered by iOS 15. However, if your preferences are strongly leaning toward one operating system over another, it makes sense to go with the phone that has the software you want.

But what should you do if you enjoy both platforms equally? In such a situation, the Galaxy A53 5G is difficult to dismiss. It boasts a far better display, more competent cameras, a significantly larger battery, and double the internal storage – all for just $80 / £20 cheaper than the iPhone SE 3. The iPhone SE 3 remains a terrific pick for die-hard iOS and small-phone enthusiasts, but if you’re willing to explore beyond Apple’s walled garden, Samsung’s A53 5G delivers a powerful punch and probably considered as the best budget smartphone.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.